Testimony, Comments and Letters to AgenciesThe Member Scholars of the Center for Progressive Reform frequently testify before congressional committees on a range of topics related to the organization’s core issues. In addition, Member Scholars often communicate with federal agencies, filing comments on proposed regulations, or bringing important matters to their attention.
Browse Testimony or Letters and Comments.
CPR Member Scholars’ testimony before congressional committees include:
2008
- Bill Buzbee's April 16, 2008 testimony before the U.S. House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure on the Rapanos and SWANCC decisions and the Clean Water Restoration Act. And the news release.
- Sidney Shapiro's April 2, 2008 testimony before the Subcommittee on Information Policy, Census and National Archives of the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, on the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 2008.
2007
- Rena Steinzor’s October 17, 2007 testimony before the Subcommittee on Superfund and Environmental Health of the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, on the Bush Administration’s failure to pursue Superfund cleanups.
- David Vladeck’s September 12, 2007 testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee on the Bush Administration’s push for agency preemption of state tort laws.
- David Vladeck’s February 13, 2007 testimony on EO 13422 before the Committee on Science and Technology Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, U.S. House of Representatives.
2006
- William Buzbee’s August 1, 2006 testimony before the Fisheries, Wildlife and Water subcommittee of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, on the implications of the Supreme Court’s decision in the Rapanos case for efforts to protect America’s waterways from polluters.
2005
- Robert R.M. Verchick’s November 17, 2005 testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on the Environment and Public Works on how preliminary findings on the failure of New Orleans’ levees should be incorporated into future plans for hurricane protection.
- Tom McGarity’s November 10, 2005 testimony to Congress on the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
- Robert R.M. Verchick’s September 29, 2005 testimony before the Subcommittee on Environment and Hazardous Materials of the House Committee on Energy & Commerce on what went wrong before, during and immediately after Hurricane Katrina.
- Sidney Shapiro’s July 20, 2005 testimony before the Subcommittee on Regulatory Affairs of the House Government Reform Committee on the Information Quality Act.
- Sidney Shapiro’s April 12, 2005 congressional testimony on OMB’s regulatory “hit list” before the House Subcommittee on Regulatory Affairs of the Committee on Government Reform.
2004
- Catherine O’Neill’s November 17, 2004 testimony to the Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Natural Resources, and Regulatory Affairs of the House Government Reform Committee on mercury pollution credit-trading proposals.
- Robert R.M. Verchick’s February 25, 2004 testimony before the Subcomittee on Energy Policy, Natural Resources and Regulatory Affairs of the House Committee on Government Reform, on the Office of Management and Budget’s Draft 2004 Report to Congress on the Costs and Benefits of Federal Regulation.
2003
- Rena Steinzor’s September 16, 2003 testimony to Congress on the Bush EPA’s poor enforcement record, September 16, 2003.
- Rena Steinzor’s June 6, 2003 testimony before the Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Natural Resources, and Regulatory Affairs of the Committee on Government Reform on proposals to elevate EPA to Cabinet status.
- Lisa Heinzerling’s March 11, 2003 testimony on OMB’s Draft 2003 Report to Congress on the Costs and Benefits of Federal Regulation.
2002
- Rena Steinzor’s June 13, 2002 testimony to the House Subcommittee on Water Resources and the Environment on Water Quality Trading Policy.
Letters and comments from Member Scholars to federal agencies include:
- Endangered Species Act Interagency Cooperation. CPR's Holly Doremus, Robert Glicksman, Alejandro Camacho, Daniel Rohlf and Margaret Clune Giblin, joined by Mark Schwartz (UC Davis), October 10, 2008, Comments on the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service's Proposed Rule on Interagency Cooperation under the Endangered Species Act.
- DOL Risk Assessment Comments. Rena Steinzor and Policy Analyst Matt Shudtz's September 29, 2008 comments on DOL's Risk Assessment proposal.
- Risk Assessment Request to Extend Comment Period. Rena Steinzor's September 5, 2008 joint letter (with 38 other experts in regulatory and labor safety matters) to the Department of Labor requesting an extension of the 30-day comment period for its risk assessment guidelines.
- IRIS Letter. Member Scholar Rena Steinzor and CPR Policy Analyst Matt Shudtz’s April 27, 2008 letter to EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson, expressing concerns about proposed “Integrated Risk Information System Assessment Development Procedures” that would slow the process of filling significant gaps in the database’s toxicological profiles for many chemicals EPA is responsible for regulating under the Clean Air, Safe Drinking Water, and Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Acts.
- Risk Assessment Bulletin. Member Scholar Rena Steinzor's June 15, 2006 letter to OMB urging it to withdraw its proposed risk assessment bulletin.
- Mercury Credit-Trading. Catherine O'Neill's January 3, 2005 comments on EPA's proposed mercury pollution credit-trading scheme.
- Comments and Testimony on Mercury Pollution Credit-Trading. Catherine O'Neill's January 3, 2005 comments to EPA on its mercury pollution credit-trading proposal.
- Comments on VOCs via IQA. CPR's Sidney Shapiro and Rena Steinzor's August 3, 2004 response to the paint industry's Information Quality Act challenge to state rules on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in paint.
- Steinzor CII Comments for DHS. Rena Steinzor’s May 2004 comments on the Department of Homeland Security’s Procedures for Handling Critical Infrastructure Information (Interim Rule).
- Comments on Peer Review Proposal. CPR's Sidney Shapiro’s December 7, 2003 comments on OMB's Proposed Bulletin on Peer Review and Information Quality.
- Steinzor CII Comments for DHS. Rena Steinzor’s June 16, 2003 comments on the Department of Homeland Security's proposed rule for handling Critical Infrastructure Information, in which she writes that "DHS needs to go back to the drawing board."
- Letter to EPA/OMB on IQA-related Effort to Censor NRDC. Read a May 21, 2003 letter to EPA and OMB from Rena Steinzor and Sidney Shapiro, responding to an attempt by the Center for Regulatory Effectiveness' to use the Information Quality Act as a weapon to censor NRDC comments on a proposed rule regulating disposal of biosolids. And read CPR's news release.
- Comments on Cooling Water Intake Standards. Read August 2002 comments from a number of CPR Member Scholars on EPA's proposal to incorporate Cost-Benefit Principles into the Technology Based Standards for Cooling Water Intake Structures.
- Comments on IQA Guidelines. Read Thomas McGarity’s May 2002 Comments on OMB's Draft Information Quality Guidelines.
|