Steinzor Reacts to SCOTUS Chesapeake Bay Case

Rena Steinzor

Feb. 29, 2016

The Supreme Court today denied certiorari in a case challenging the watershed-wide effort led by the EPA to reduce pollution flowing into the Chesapeake Bay. The Court's action leaves standing a lower court ruling upholding the effort. CPR Member Scholar Rena Steinzor, Professor of Law at the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, issued the following reaction:

"The Supreme Court's decision is a milestone victory for the restoration of the Chesapeake Bay and the thousands of local waters in the Bay watershed. Today's decision should at last put an end to any efforts to evade responsibility for reducing nutrient and sediment pollution. The Bay cleanup effort still has a very long way to go, with a lot of tough decisions and hard work ahead, but the Court's ruling should give hope to the millions of people in this region who have had to live with degraded and polluted waters for decades. Moreover, the decision is a clear affirmation of the plain meaning of the Clean Water Act and EPA's authority to enforce it. As the Farm Bureau has argued, it has nationwide implications."

Read More by Rena Steinzor
CPR HOMEPAGE
More on CPR's Work & Scholars.
June 3, 2021

Connect the Dots Podcast Explores Clean Energy Policy and Local, State, and Federal Governance

May 27, 2021

Drilled News Op-Ed: The Supreme Court’s Obscure Procedural Ruling In Baltimore’s Climate Case, Explained

May 24, 2021

Getting the Lead Out

May 21, 2021

Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Biden EPA

May 20, 2021

Financing the Clean Energy Transition: A Connect the Dots Podcast Episode

May 13, 2021

Baltimore Sun Op-Ed: Is the Maryland Department of the Environment Cleaning Up Its Act When It Comes to Enforcement?

May 7, 2021

The Ninth Circuit Makes EPA an Offer It Can't Refuse