Steinzor in The Environmental Forum: Vital to Prosecute Corporate Bad Actors

by Brian Gumm

May 20, 2016

With the congressional majority continuing to gut enforcement budgets, forcing federal environmental and workplace safety agencies to cut staff, criminal prosecution of corporate bad actors is more important than ever. That's the thrust of Center for Progressive Reform Member Scholar Rena Steinzor's commentary in the May/June issue of The Environmental Forum, the policy journal of the Environmental Law Institute

As Steinzor notes in the piece: 

The BP [oil spill] and Volkswagen [emissions cheating] scan­dals, by their size and audacity, should motivate significant chang­es in the approach to criminal environmental enforcement, and if those changes make [the federal Department of Justice] more aggressive, they will come just in time, because EPA and the states’ routine civil enforcement is arguably in worse shape than at any time since the agency was created 46 years ago. EPA has endured a decade of deep budget cuts and endless bureaucracy bashing. In constant dollars, EPA has less to spend than at any time since the 1990s, when it began to implement the latest Clean Air Act Amendments. Last year, it announced a 30 percent cut in routine inspections and a 23 per­cent reduction in civil enforcement actions. Most of the states delegated to implement regulatory pro­grams are in at least as dire shape. 

Predictably, industry interests are none too pleased with the renewed focus on prosecuting corporate crimes and holding executives accountable for their companies' irresponsible actions: 

DOJ’s toughening stance seems to have accel­erated the momentum of conservative efforts on Capitol Hill to weaken the laws that apply to so-called “regulatory crimes,” shoving health, safety, and environmental criminal enforcement into the powerful cross-currents of an election year. Lead­ing the charge for making it tougher to prosecute white collar crimes in the health, safety, and envi­ronmental arenas are the Heritage Foundation, the Cato Institute, and Koch Industries. 

Steinzor explores that cynical push to fold corporate crimes into an overall criminal justice reform bill in another commentary, which was published in the Spring edition of The American Prospect

Alongside Steinzor's in-depth Environmental Forum column, commentators from the DOJ, a legal defense firm, and the oil and gas industry's American Petroleum Institute offer their views on addressing environmental and workplace safety crimes. 

You can read Steinzor's Environmental Forum piece here, and The American Prospect piece here

The full text of "Time for Environmental Crimes" is provided courtesy of the Environmental Law Institute, © 2016.

Be the first to comment on this entry.
We ask for your email address so that we may follow up with you, ask you to clarify your comment in some way, or perhaps alert you to someone else's response. Only the name you supply and your comment will be displayed on the site to the public. Our blog is a forum for the exchange of ideas, and we hope to foster intelligent, interesting and respectful discussion. We do not apply an ideological screen, however, we reserve the right to remove blog posts we deem inappropriate for any reason, but particularly for language that we deem to be in the nature of a personal attack or otherwise offensive. If we remove a comment you've posted, and you want to know why, ask us ( and we will tell you. If you see a post you regard as offensive, please let us know.

Also from Brian Gumm

Brian Gumm is the Communications Director at the Center for Progressive Reform. Prior to joining CPR in March 2016, he spent nearly a decade in several roles at the Center for Effective Government, including communications director and senior writer.

The Center for Progressive Reform

2021 L St NW, #101-330
Washington, DC. 20036

© Center for Progressive Reform, 2015