Every year, OSHA mails a letter to about 15,000 employers who run high-hazard worksites, warning them that their most recent annual injury and illness rates were well above average. According to OSHA,
For every 100 full-time workers, the 15,000 employers had 4.5 or more injuries or illnesses which resulted in days away from work, restricted work or job transfer. The national average is 2.0.
The letters went out in March, but I just got around to digging into the list of recipients (zip file), and thought I’d share some analysis that I haven’t seen anywhere else. Sorting the list by industry code, I put together a chart of the industries that received the most total letters -- down through the top 10 percent of them. The chart gives some additional detail (like the percent of surveyed employers who received letters in each industry), but here’s the rub:
These data, in other words, show where a lot of the injuries and illnesses are occurring (keep in mind also that some of these industries are far bigger than others).
The letters are, for the most part, a stern warning. The 15,000 employers that received a letter were culled from a list of 80,000 employers who submitted injury and illness data to the agency under the OSHA Data Initiative survey. The ODI asks for injury and illness data from 100,000 employers with more than 40 employees, in a limited number of industries. Without getting into the many details (pdf), each year over 4,000 of the 80,000 ODI respondents are added to OSHA’s primary inspections list through the Site-Specific Targeting program. Although the 4,000 primary targets do not necessarily overlap with the 15,000 letter recipients, no employer wants to receive a personal missive from the head of OSHA.
The letters are intended to put industries on notice that there’s a problem, and that OSHA is paying attention. And clearly some industries and employers are in need of a wake-up call. If OSHA releases the list of letter recipients again next year, we’ll see if that’s the case.
Matt Shudtz, Policy Analyst, Center for Progressive Reform. Bio.
|Be the first to comment on this entry.|