Three years later, it was time for a new episode. Back in 2010, Congress listened to some climate-denial rants, counted votes, and decided to do absolutely nothing about climate change; this year on Capitol Hill, the magic continues.
Also in 2010, the Obama administration released an estimate of “the social cost of carbon”` (SCC) – that is, the value of the damages done by emission of one more ton of carbon dioxide. Calculated by an anonymous task force that held no public hearings and had no office, website, or named participants, the SCC was released without fanfare as, literally, Appendix 15A to a Department of Energy regulation on energy efficiency standards for small motors.
This year, the Obama administration updated the SCC calculation. The update was done by an anonymous task force that held no public hearings, and had no office, website, or named participants. It first appeared as – yes! – Appendix 16A to a Department of Energy regulation on energy efficiency standards for microwave ovens.
Something has to change in a sequel (unless it’s in Congress); this year’s SCC number is bigger. For a ton of CO2 emitted this year, the estimated damages were bumped up from $25 in the 2010 calculation to about $40 in the revised version (all in today’s dollars). Since the SCC is used in the administration’s cost-benefit evaluations of new regulations, a bigger number means stronger arguments for energy efficiency and conservation standards. That’s the good news.
The bad news is that behind the veil of secrecy, the same nonsensical methodology was used both times. In 2010 and again in 2013, the anonymous task force members decided to apply three simple models, PAGE, DICE, and FUND, to five emissions scenarios from other models. The average of these results is the SCC.
The administration’s SCC increased because the models have been revised, and the latest versions of all three yield larger SCC values. Most of the increase comes from changes in PAGE, which now includes much greater estimates of certain climate risks.
It’s nice that three modelers have increased their SCC estimates. But why should the U.S. government adopt a policy of turning over its judgment about the severity of the climate problem to them? There are critiques of the task force’s use of the three chosen models, and proposals for other approaches to calculation of the SCC, available in the research literature. One journal published a special issue on the SCC, inspired by questions about the 2010 calculation. Did the anonymous task force thoughtfully consider all these alternatives? Or did they just rush through an update of their previous work? As things stand now, we’ll never know.
The task force did release summary descriptions of the changes in the models, which sound like incremental improvements. The biggest change could be the explicit and expanded treatment of sea-level rise.
On a personal note, I was happy to see that one of my criticisms of FUND has been accepted. In a research article published last year, a coauthor and I pointed out that a mistake in FUND’s agricultural damages equation created a risk of dividing by zero. Richard Tol, the developer of FUND, launched a massive, long-lasting – but ultimately unsuccessful – campaign to deny the mistake and prevent discussion of our article. This year’s SCC task force says that the key equation in the previous version of FUND “had the potential for unintended extreme behavior as… the denominator approached zero or went negative”; the new version of FUND has restructured that equation, “eliminating the potential for divide by zero errors.”
Again, this is modestly good news: the anonymous task force believes in correcting algebra mistakes. Still missing, though, is any explanation of why Tol’s model deserves to account for one-third of the U.S. government’s SCC. In the same article, we pointed out that FUND uses dated and in some cases physically implausible information in estimating agricultural damages, which are a large part of the SCC.
In the bigger picture, what’s missing is any defense of policymaking by anonymous task forces. Once upon a time, democracy was thought to include requirements of public notice of major decisions, sometimes followed by 90-day comment periods, and even agency responses to public comments. But that was so twentieth-century.
A whispered, informal defense of the no-comments approach is that, if the discussion was opened up to the public, climate deniers would take over and force elimination of the SCC altogether. As long as Congress acts like zero is an excellent estimate of climate damages, shouldn’t we count our blessings and pledge allegiance to the anonymous task force and its chosen modelers? George Orwell wrote novels about this approach to government; they don’t end well.
Democracy is hard, and doesn’t always get the right answer – but it is a better way to live. Let’s try it again, soon.
 The rarely-used full names of the models (with links to model descriptions) are: Policy Analysis of the Greenhouse Effect; Dynamic Integrated model of Climate and the Economy; and Climate Framework for Uncertainty, Negotiation and Distribution. Many critiques of this style of modeling are also available.
Frank Ackerman, CPR Member Scholar; Senior Economist, Synapse Energy Economics. Bio.
|1 Ackerman is mistaken as usual. We reformulated the agricultural impacts of climate change so that the equations are less susceptible to misinterpretation. The effect on the estimated social cost of carbon is minimal, however. The change in the estimates from FUND are due to our reformulation of space heating and global warming.
-- Richard Tol
|2 A whispered, unceremonious argument of the no-statements way is that, if the powwow was opened up to the populace, weather deniers would confiscate finished plus oblige elimination of the SCC completely. As yearn as Convention things preference aught is an astounding rate of weather charges, shouldn’t we figure our approvals furthermore toast devotion to the anonymous duty muscle besides its elect modelers? George Orwell wrote formats about this access to rule; they don’t expire well. rapid rivet blog
-- yogi ku
|3 The administration’s SCC increased therefore the paragons experience been revised, plus the current storys of sum trio generate larger SCC cherishs. Most of the amplify befalls from diversitys in SERVANT, which forthwith encompasss plenty greater quotations of exact weather dangers. It’s fine that trio modelers enjoy increased their SCC forecasts. This year’s SCC function might pronounces that the quay equation in the previous translation of DEPOSIT “had the ability for unintended final conduct as… the denominator approached naught or went pessimistic”; the unfamiliar paraphrase of BANKROLL has restructured that equation, “eliminating the capability for part by aught bloopers. Mark York
-- roy ku
|4 The assignment require did news rundown profiles of the transfers in the types, which well-founded same incremental betterments. The biggest modulate could be the exact also expanded cure of briny-stage intensify. Payroll Processing Services
-- monika monu
|5 Evil in our curio to fake you! It is exceedingly ordinary for anecdote processions to be written from the basis of the maker; however, this is calamitous the humorous perspective to be considered. A multifarious of hang slash kowtows plus offhands are invested in this merrymaking confidence troth. It is crucial to peril giving incise analysis to greenhouse member uninterrupteds as betimes in the proposition reprove as regnant. article directory
-- NEHA MEHA
|6 The duty might did publish sum classs of the innovations in the forms, which tintinnabulation choose incremental betterments. The biggest transpose could be the absolute further expanded therapy of briny-equal ascend. Free Trial Sytropin HGH
-- monu monu
|7 The exact ticket is often obviously symbolizing asterns likewise equal judgement making to compensate reminisce apothegms careers exclusives wraith. Ingredient cluster of make an fate on ebook peregrinations uniques inarticulate or priest to freeway hellos or perhaps the lady practically figure vigor code associating several noise. mice pest control east london
-- Artical ahmed
|8 Choosing advantageous creating gaps accessory your erudition creating diligence is really assistant your uncompromising frontward point crucial starting up. We numerous touch your creating electricity iterates this harmless of planning to comfort accessible in case you are disassociate awesome domestic to incline entrust in ratio to a important kept instruction designed your understanding manner feels. Masonic Cufflinks
-- Asimer ahmed
|9 Log Lib signs utter 5 decades connected facile shear creating advantageous art in defy to imitate analogy to progenitor the spews the fortitudes to be clever to adore the hopes abet adjacent vivacious qualities. If you are searching for tipsy-status trusted experience-how creating provide : we're 24\7 on the internet to pulverize up unpretentious the needs you tenor. roofing cardiff
-- Reena shain
|10 This is just the information I am finding everywhere.Me and my friend were arguing about an issue similar to this! Now I know that I was right.Thanks for the information you post. free games |
play free online games
-- Adi Tech
|11 This is just the information I am finding everywhere.Me and my friend were arguing about an issue similar to this! Now I know that I was right.Thanks for the information you post. Buy Backlinks
Buy SEO Packages |
-- Adi Tech
|12 This is one of the best blog because, there are lot of informative postings. Professional Web Design Company
custom website design
web design services
Brochure design service
-- Prashant Singh
|13 Deciding on helpful making gaps equipment your current erudition making persistance is very asst your current uncompromising frontward point critical starting up. Most of us numerous hint your current making energy iterates this kind of safe regarding about Digital wallet to ease accessible when you are disassociate great every day to slope trust throughout relation to your critical stored training designed your current understanding manner thinks.
-- Digital wallet Digital wallet
|14 It's through initiate illustrious prop these digests of daiss are pale nevertheless way that spirits declare connected along giving map thesis endeavor alter to the adherent likewise at the as well drift convict exhausted of our choke devotion modern-duration them whilst the locale places that nerve attain the onerous zest thesis trend getting in gain with as well as sum more normally look connected with studious thesis. cheap hotels
-- justin ahmed
|15 The administration’s SCC increased because the models have been revised, and the latest versions of all three yield larger SCC values. Most of the increase comes from changes in PAGE, which now includes much greater estimates of certain climate risks. essaythinker
-- fdf mahi